Prompt 3

1. Listen to Gould’s 1955 recording of the Goldberg Variations. Then listen to his 1981 version of the same piece. You may find it more effective to listen via Spotify instead of YouTube as the individual sections are easier to access.

2. Choose the same section of each version. This is important.

3. Compare and contrast the differences in each performance. Consider SHMRG elements, textural elements, and anything else that serves your interpretation of these very distinct and difference performances. Take your time and try to articulate sound using words.

4. Total word count: 250 words max.

Theodore Kim
V00960161
Music 116
Dr. Patrick Boyle
October 10, 2020

Blog Prompt 3

Glenn Gould’s recordings of “The Goldberg Variations,” by J.S. Bach, in 1955 and later in 1981 differ greatly in aspects such as dynamics, tempo and articulation – at least in the first few minutes of each recording. The analysis of both recordings suggests that they are more different than similar.

Compared with the 1955 recording, the 1981 recording had more dynamic variation and direction. In terms of dynamic variation, the dynamic range was wider, meaning it could reach greater ‘louds’ and ‘softs.’ The bottom line was brought out more often, creating further dynamic contrast and a more interesting dialogue between the upper and lower voice. Stronger dynamic direction was achieved by often pairing upwards and downwards movement of pitch with increases and decreases of volume respectively. Volume was also less terraced and more free-flowing. In other words, it experienced more gradual change. These characteristics suggest that the 1981 recording provides greater dynamic variation and direction and thus a more thoughtful and nuanced use of volume.

The 1981 recording was significantly slower than the 1955 recording. In terms of the section that is being analysed, the 1981 recording is roughly a minute longer than the 1955 recording, which speaks to the former’s slower tempo and relaxed character. Whether deliberate or because of the slower tempo, many of the ornaments seem more drawn out and clearly articulated, which arguably allows them to be better savoured. There was also more bending and stretching of time in the 1981 recording – not so much that the sound ventured outside of the historical style, but enough to create more compelling articulation.